http://folk.uio.no/potnes/OtnesKritFenom.pdf
Translation: Professor Otnes writes in Sosiologiske Årbok - The Phenomenology of Criticism:

"Joking aside, one weakness of Engelstad's text is that it treats sociology as a pure thought discipline, a conceptual work without social origin, support, suppliers and consumers. Already about 30 years ago, when Robert Priddy and Arvid Hansen did their large research foundation-supported study of Norwegian social science, their conclusion was clear: "There are things which social research very much resemble, and that is bureaucracy" (see Sosiologiske årbok 2000-1). That similarity has hardly grown less since then. The 'free research institutes' have grown, developed and flowered, but under a far stricter in-built control than before. Free finances hardly exist, practically all social research is financed through programs...