ATHLETICS, PLAYGROUND GAMES & CRAZES
(FOOTBALL,
CLICK HERE)
ATHLETICS
Athletics report 1965: [Written by one P.M.Benson. Thanking
the fifth-formers for giving up their weekends to officiate, he notes that
"It is a pity that the rest of the school didn't show the same enthusiasm
- the support for the Saturday meeting was disgraceful."
"Normans ... overall winners with Saxons second. Romans and Danes were
3rd and 4th respectively some 48 points behind the leaders." ]
basket ball report 1965 ["Credit for all our success must go to Mr.
Benson ... who has given freely of his time to referee matches."]
RAF Section Notes 1965 ["Annual camp was spent with R.A.F Bomber Command
Cottesmore, Rutlandshire."].
roman house report 1965 [Incomplete - perhaps Colin could supply the remainder,
and maybe other House reports. Romans' year was "overall rather disappointing"
and they won the swimming competition "for the first time in living
memory"]
the school computer 1965 [Highlights: "Our computer is much smaller
than the Cape Kennedy types but it can be used for weapon control systems
... In the school we are more concerned with its industrial uses."
"The store has 8,192 store locations."]
PLAYGROUND & OTHER GAMES
‘HAND TENNIS’
Hand tennis is being played between the boy in foreground and the one by the poplar (still from 1953 film)
DGM mentioned "hand tennis" - no rackets required,
just a bit of chalk nicked from any classroom and a worn-out old tennis ball!.
Indeed so - Dave Workman, a particular pal of mine, was particularly adept
at this sport - he could put a spin on the ball, without any artificial aid,
that you wouldn't believe! (Andy LeeDGM mentioned "hand tennis"
- no rackets required, just a bit of chalk nicked from any classroom and a
worn-out old tennis ball!. Indeed so - Dave Workman, a particular pal of mine,
was particularly adept at this sport - he could put a spin on the ball, without
any artificial aid, that you wouldn't believe! (Andy Lee)
... who can remember that great British sport that took part in the late 60's and early 1970's at the RLS at least? That of the craze for Hand Tennis.
Everyone who usually tried to duck out of games would willingly rush to draw up a court at break and lunch on the driveway to the school from the pavilion entrance or anywhere else where a piece of tarmac had not been commandeered. Then spending their time thumping a ball using their hand as an imaginary tennis racket, getting all hot and sweaty and enduring endless arguments (McEnroe had nothing on some of them - perhaps he could have learned from
RLS) arising over dubious decisions never mind no 2 courts were they same size. Oh what endless hours of fun. (Tony Guest)
My daughter plays tennis and thus moves in the tennis clique - but at no time in all her history of playing the game have I ever run across hand tennis being played ANYWHERE. Did we invent it at RLS? Was it the circumstantial width of the tarmacced drive that lent itself to this sport? When was it invented? Was it a derivation of the '66 entry? Or will some older, wiser member lay claim? (ash howe)
Those who wonder what ‘hand tennis’ may be can see two boys can be seen playing hand tennis on the RLS 53/4 film under the elm at the rear entrance near Bert Peade’s coke pile! It was included in Vince’s Reuinion 2002 School Song video on-line. (Robert Priddy)
We noted two current boys (students) playing a version of
hand tennis in the playground. {Note - at the 2002 RLSOB
It was well established upon my '65 arrival, Ash. Forehand was a tinge easier than backhand!
Have fond memories of a young guy in our class dropping his new parker fountain pen (blue and gold of course) after a volley and yours truly getting in a smash on his bonce while he stooped down. (anon)
Hand tennis was definitely played at RLS during my time and
not just during
French Cricket - from the RLS film 'A Day at the RLS' 1953
The game was unique to RLS, at least as far as I've been able to find out. My brother, a Bush Elms lout, never came across it, and various chums in other local schools also never played it (and didn't show much interest when demonstrated). I suspect it was that unique width of road that led to its popularity - no need to draw sidelines, and 'out' decisions were easy. If I remember correctly the road tapered so that courts were thinner at one end of the road than the other - which was the broad end?
You could tell a lot about the character of the masters as they drove in to school during the hand tennis season - some driving off the path to avoid disturbing the games in progress, others trying to push through anyway. Who's bringing the tennis balls and chalk July 6th? (Pete Isaac) I can report that Hand Tennis was played upon that very same tarmac drive as early as 1961/62. (Andy Lee)
This pastime was on the go during the early 50's, and we have no claim to be the originators. In the absence of a suitable opponent, hand squash was in order, providing you could clear the section of wall against which 1st formers were flicking their cigarette cards. One craze to sweep the school in the 2nd year was Jacks or Gobs, call it what you like. And of course, the perennial pastime of eroding the fabric of the brickwork, by grinding hemispherical holes with an old penny whilst awaiting the morning bunfight. (Phil Kingham) As a family we were introduced to Indoor Cricket by Macca. Blue Peter researchers discovered that kids were playing the game and had them do a demonstration in the studio. David was doing the bowling. He had a superb natural action. (Richard Hall)
Hon Member Bailey wrote: The "new" (Coles-inspired) 6A hut had to be the most boring place on the planet. Choice of recreation - Bridge or lump it."
JOHN ... not sure when or how it arrived, but during my days the main form of entertainment in the hut was Bebe table-top football, the coin slot having been tampered with to provide free access. (Bebe football, for those whose memories need jerking, has two teams of players on rods which are spun to 'kick' the ball).
Casting aside modesty purely in the interests of sociological record, I should point out that Non Hon Member (but Hon Member Howe's best chum) Steve Hennessey and I were the undefeated world champions. There were nine balls and matches were played over two 'legs' - ie a total of 18 goals - so that each pairing had a match using the red and blue players, and one turn each at dropping the balls in to start play.
For dropping, substitute in our case spinning. Perhaps because my fingers were (still are) much smaller than average I was able to hold the ball in the aperture with my finger on top. I perfected the art of pressing down and sideways so that spin was imparted to the ball, projecting it straight to one of our front-line players who would use the pace and spin to hammer it (with a high success rate) straight into the opposing goal.
We more often than not scored at least eight goals on our 'home leg' and thus proved impossible to beat, although I do remember us having to come from seven goals adrift on one occasion to draw and force a play-off, which we won. There was no rule to suggest my method of re-starting the game was anything but legal with the only law, an immutable regulation, being that handles must be gripped at all times during play and not spun with the fingertips only. The four corners of the pitch had little recesses which 'caught' the ball for corners, which were taken by pushing in the attacking rod nearest the goal being defended. I seem to recall the aforementioned Hon Member Howe, uttering many and varied expletives, taking out his frustration when losing by taking his corners with excessive force. (Chris Stratford)
Chris Stratford posted:
"Steve Hennessey and I were the undefeated world champions."
Yes, alright, alright. Grant you that. The partnership of
Abo-Ben-Henderson did win the odd game. But that was doubles. I seem to recall I was the SINGLES champion (unless my memory has those rose-tinted glasses on again? Any counter-claims?).
"There was no rule to suggest my method of re-starting the game was anything but legal with the only law, an immutable regulation, being that handles must be gripped at all times during play and not spun with the fingertips only."
Absolutely - NO spinning. Detracts from the skill and majesty of the beautiful game. But I would put to you, Mr. Stratford, and indeed to the members, that your method of ball insertion may have been within the letter of the law (although I never saw any laws at all actually written down) but was definitely contra to the spirit of rods.
"I seem to recall the aforementioned Hon Member Howe,uttering many and varied expletives, taking out his frustration when losing by taking his corners with excessive force." (ashley howe)
Of course what has been missing so far is the description of a 'proper' Table Football game. It probably would have had a glass lid which would prevent the players from spinning and a wire cage around the entry hole which would severely limit the 'spin action'. But of course the 6A hut version was missing both. I wouldn't suggest it was broken in the hut, but was probably somebody's 'throw away'.
I was always more of a fan of the controlled wrist movement with an occasional full spin and of course lifting the whole table up by the bars when the ball did get stuck in the corner or between ranks. My favourite position was always defence in doubles, with the occasional 'rocket' goal from the defensive 2. (Chris Fribbins)
Further to comments about the origination of hand tennis and whether it was/is peculiar to RLS, I have to report that, during a rain break at Wimbledon today the camera picked out a young (too young for RLS) lad wearing a blue and yellow cap (baseball variety) clearly playing hand tennis! He was good too! (David Maltby)
BRITISH BULLDOG/HIGH COCKALORUM ETC.
Can anyone remember the name of the playground game in which one person stood with his back against a wall, several more formed a line of "piggy backs" in front of him and the rest took turns to run at high speed, leapfrog as far onto the backs as possible until the weight of bodies caused the whole to collapse into a laughing, screaming pile with those underneath usually sustaining some minor injury? (David Maltby)
I think that this was called 'BRITISH BULLDOG' - not sure why. (Robin Hackshall)
I thought British Bulldog was where you started with one player in the middle and the rest of the school on one side of the playground. The object was to rush from one side to the other without getting caught. The catcher had to detain an opponent by holding him round the waist for 3 seconds. The catchee then joined catcher. As the game progressed, there were more people to catch, and less to run......I think. (Vince Leatt)
Vince Leatt is quite right in correcting my error (erroneously describing the leap-frogging game as British Bulldog). I have consulted my father (East Ham Grammar then Slough Grammar when a certain Herr Hitler re-arranged schooling within range of the Luftwaffe, so not eligable for our group.) Dave Maltby's game was called BUNGLE BARREL or (perhaps locally) HIGH JIMANACKER. Dad believes that different schools had different names. When he played it, it was a team game and the song High Jimanacker (?) was sung during play. On one occasion Dad has his head knocked through a window during the game and was caned for such vandalism. Nothing Changes. (Robin Hackshall)
We used to call this exercise 'Hi Jimmy Knacker' for reasons at the time unknown but knacker you it did. It was a game only played by the boys, possibly because Edwin Lambert had separate playgrounds for boys and girls. I was usually put at the estimated landing point of the person jumping on as I was of very stout build in those days (and of these days indeed). But did any other schools partake of this peculiar practice? (Richard Hall)
Although the "common" name for the game was British bulldog, the classic title is "High Cockalorum" and was a favorite in the RAF mess during the 2nd world war. (Mike Merry)
This description almost exactly matches that
given in one or more of a dozen books I have on the British
in
However it was spelled, the game was undoubtedly called 'Hi Jimmy Knacker'in the Edwin Lambert playground. The recollections of Robin's father are interesting as the game was periodically banned by the powers-that-be because of injuries to participants and/or damage to school fabric. If I remember correctly it was a team game, the object being to seat the entire team for the duration of the chant in which case the "backs" had won. The objective of the jumping team was to descend with such force onto the backs that the supports collapsed in which case the jumpers had undoubtedly won. Not as technical, perhaps, as Quidditch but you could often do as much damage! (David Maltby)
What then was the name of the following game played in the Gym which, until now, had been British Bulldog in my brain cell ... The class divides into 3 groups and takes up parallel lines - Group A at one end of the Gym; Group B at the other; Group C in the middle. One of Group A projects a basketball or similar a few inches above the floor towards Group B, hoping to strike one of Group C below the knee. One of Group B retrieves the missile and repeats the exercise. The trick was to repeat this toing-and-froing as quickly as possible, hoping to catch one of Group C off-guard facing the wrong way, making him easy prey. Once struck in the target area the C-boy would sit out the rest of the game atop the wallbars. Once all C-boys are 'out' the groups rotate positions and play again. (Andy Lee)
KINGIE, WINKLE, REBOUND & RELEASE ETC.
The games kingie and winkle seem to be related.
Kingie was a kind of tag, played with a tennis ball. An area
of play with boundaries was determined. One person was chosen
by some chance method and he became 'it'. He took the ball and
tried to hit any of the others anywhere on the body except the
hands/fists. Once hit, that person joined the one who was
'it' making a team of two. This went on until all of
the team who were 'out' were out, by going over to the same
side. The last man was the winner. Defence was with the fist
only, for which purpose a hankerchief
could be wound round it to avoid sore knuckles. Those who were
still 'live' were not allowed to pick up or otherwise touch
the ball... all they could do was run. The game soon became
unsatisfactory, for it was easy for several who were allowed
to handle the ball to hit the remaining players.
Winkle employed the same way of defending oneself and the same
rules of who could and could not touch the ball. But there were
two teams of equal numbers. The game started with a 'winkle'-
that is, five uneven stones of descending sizes piled on top
of one another. It was built up about a yard in front of a wall.
The team who was 'out' (i.e. roaming in the field) sent one
member at a time to try to knock down the winkle. The ball was
to be thrown from a distance of about 5 or more yards and had
to hit the wall first, then fall on
the winkle. Each player had three throws. As soon as the winkle
was down, the ball became 'live' and could be picked up and
thrown by the team who were winkle-defenders. The aim was to
hit out all of the opponents (who became 'dead' once touched
by the ball anywhere but on the hands) before they could sneak
back and rebuild the winkle. If rebuilt before all were dead,
a new round was started with the same teams in and defending
the winkle, the score now being one to the attackers. If all
were hit before the winkle could be rebuilt, the teams changed
sides. The game was agreed as being finished within a given
time limit (eg. end of lunch break).
In practise, the main weakness of the game was that it would
stagnate if the defending team kept the ball stingily near to
the destroyed winkle... so as to keep the others from rebuilding
it. This could have been solved by a system of time limits and
setting boundaries beyond which the ball must go within the
limit - but would have been complicated and required a (timekeeper
and) referee, which no one wanted to be. Perhaps this is partly
why we do not see World Cup Winkle on TV yet? (Robert Priddy)
Robert's reference to Kingie and Winkle brought me back to two wide games we played at school. The first was called, er 'Stickie'(?) and 'Release'. Correct me if I am wrong. Stickie was played in the confines of the playground. 'It' would run up to 'catch' another player by touching him above the waist. They would join hands and the pair would then try to catch another. Then they would join hands. This would continue until there was a long line. Or did they break into two at some point or were there two 'Its'? Boys could be caught in a sort of human net. To prevent being caught the boys would have to stand off the playground (on a drain cover for example) and 'It' would do his best to entice you off, without touching. The game concluded when all were caught or the bell 'went'. I remember long lines of boys holding hands and circulating around the playground, the boys at the circumference would run faster and faster until they fell over. Blood and bruising. Release was played throughout the school grounds, including High Trees, best at night at scouts. Two equal teams would play, one the hunters, the others the hunted. Once caught (by touching above the waist or three thumps on the head?), the hunted were trusted to return to a central point, say the large tree outside the gym (?) and would have to hold hands with other caught boys. One end of the line would touch the tree the other free to circle it. A 'free' member of the hunted would attempt to touch the captured line to release it. Thus the captured would be guarded by the hunters. The end of the game came about when all were caught or to a time limit. Is this right? Couldn't have boys holding hands these days (David Silverside)
When one did not partake of school dinners there was an hour and forty-five minutes available for whatever you fancied doing. This time could be passed in several ways, many of them against school rules but interesting just the same. The legal ones could be "Rebound", where a ball was kicked against the northern wall of the woodwork shop and an angle chosen which would make it very difficult for the next kicker to hit the wall. This game had one disadvantage as Scruff would usually sweep by at some point on his way to his house and offer advice on dress etc. to players ("Get those hands outyrpockets" and "Pull those socks up").
Another one was the collective type hide and
seek where one player would have to search for all the other
players. The game started at the large tree which grew in front
of the bicycle sheds and the Gymnasium and when the first "seeker"
found someone that someone would also have to search for the
remainder of the players. As you were found you went from "hider"
to "searcher". The idea was to touch the tree before
you could be caught. In the rain it became very interesting
because people would slip in the puddles and mud and you could
also run through the trees along the
Can anybody remember the names of any wide games we played in the playground/on the field/high trees. I remember 'Sticky' and 'Release' (David Silverside)
...the only wide game I ever knew was called
flag-raiding. Perhaps you played that? Two
teams, each having a flag at their secret base camp.
Have to locate the enemy, invade and capture their flag without
losing your own. Played it at prep.
school in the
How do you prevent the enemy from snitching
your flag? Brute force and physical violence come to mind...!?
This sounds uncommonly similar to a CCF "war game"
we played in very wet woods at Pirbright
one year. Royal
During wet lunch breaks and after school, until
we were thrown out by the Caretaker, we used to play table-tennis
in the Physics Lab. The
benches made super table-tennis tables, if somewhat on the narrow
side, and we used our hymn books propped up on their edges to
make a net. All we needed
was a ball because we also used hymn books as bats. The benches also made super pitches for twopenny-halfpenny football, although it was best played with
two pennies and a sixpence.
A six-inch ruler was used to hit the penny against the
sixpence to knock it towards the opponent's goal and we organised
leagues and cup competitions. For goalposts we used to drive pins into the
very edge of the bench. In
the summer we used to play 'Howzat'
with the bowler's results and batsmen's scores written on the
sides of hexagonal pencils so the game was easily pocketable
when a master appeared. Oh - happy days! (
TENNIS
Wimbledon
is upon us again and I wondered if a peculiarly RLS "fad"
lasted for any length of time after 1962.
As soon as the first ball was hit on the Centre Court a rash
of chalk-drawn mini-tennis courts would litter every inch
of every tarmac surface within the grounds for the purpose
of "hand tennis" - no rackets required, just a bit
of chalk nicked from any classroom and a worn-out old tennis
ball!. One of the favourite sites was the drive leading in
from Hall Lane - good width - but this would necessitate occasional
evacuation if a staff car hove into site! Many's the good
cursing that Oscar received by appearing in the middle of
set point!
I don't remember the Liberty being too well off for proper
tennis courts. Wasn't there just the one grass court on the
right of the drive in from Upper Brentwood Road? Kept in immaculate
condition as I recall, (I bet Dobbin, the grizzled-headed
horse use to tiptoe across it, in his heyday, in his little
leather carpet slippers towing a lawn mower!) but part of
the "class thing" which pervaded the Liberty - kept
solely for the use of prefects!!
Never mind! Pete Benson, a man not renowned, I believe, for
his love of tennis, frequently used to sabotage (semper) proceedings
here by using the tennis court for outdoor trampoline sessions
(nice flat surface), after which you could guarantee the presence
of four nice deep depressions on or near the service box line.
I have to say that the sudden unpredictable bounce from these
areas never seemed to have too much effect on the quality
of the prefects' games! (David Maltby)
ROAD RUNS - CROSS-COUNTRY
I recall that during my first year we were suddenly told
that instead of football there would be a cross country run. I know we started
off down
I think the road runs were intended to protect the football
pitches from excessive damage in wet weather. There was a shorter return route
in the first & second years through
Polgreen was it John? in your year? It was he who taught me how to win the school
cross-country races - and I was always thankful that he left so that I had the
opportunity to follow in his footsteps. I would not have rated my chances in competition
with him! There were several schools of thought relating to that 'orrible hill up to the mansion. Polgreen
advocated taking it easy up the hill while others less thoughtful flogged their
guts out. Then, as soon as the hill levelled for the run round the mansion and
back down he would put in a sprint, pass everyone, fly DOWN the hill and leave
all opposition floundering for the relatively easy run in along the long flat
cinder path. I watched him do it when I was in the third year, won the junior
race in my fourth year and the senior race for the next three years - all using
his tried and trusted method. None of this ever stopped me HATING
cross-country! But the things one would do - just once a year - for the glory
of the house!!! (DGM) In the mid 50's, this event took place, I think, from a
park north of the
I have absolutely no idea what Kingham is talking about. My cross country runs were done with the maximum of effort, only 2 paces behind the sports master of the day (Taffy, as I recall), tending to his every need. David Gregory)
All I recall about it is proceeding so far along the route from the start, concealing oneself in the undergrowth until the more energetic types were returning and joining them for the "final" part of the course! (Bob Tucker)
It sounds to me as if this some sort of ' rite of passage ' which was a part of our rich RLS heritage. I certainly remember it happening. What puzzles me is: 1) If it was such a common occurrence, why didn't more of us (oops, I mean them!) get caught more often? 2) Did each generation think that they invented the scam or was the knowledge passed down as part of some arcane ceremony? Come to think of it I MAY have been lead astray by my elder brother. Bruv? (GAL)
I feel confident that the latter part of #2 above applied. This would be EXACTLY the sort of seditious training that would be grapevined down from year to year. I was going to ask why all those anti-energy-expending, non-sporty types would opt to do cross-country (nasty, messy, muddy, cold, wet, savage, ache-promoting, pointless pastime!) in the first place - but then I realised that the answer is obvious! The activity, as described so succinctly in these annals, was the perfect solution. No other Wednesday afternoon sporting activity offered so much unsupervised time and could be "organised" to involve the least possible raising of sweat. Why were they not caught more often? I would imagine that the staff just could not be bothered! Out of sight, out of mind and the staff were probably equally grateful for the chance of a sly ciggie! Surely none of the staff actually ran the course, did they? (DGM)
All this talk of Cross Country skiving prompted a quick furkle through my box of RLS memorabilia to refresh my memory on the other aspect of the subject - the "serious" running! As I recall it years 1, 2, 3 and 4 were eligible for the Inter House Junior race and the 5th and 6th years contested the Senior race. Again as I recall it there was very little point in 1st and 2nd years entering the competition except to make up the numbers. I don't remember who was the Roman Athletics captain in 1958 but, whoever the persuasive, smooth-tongued b*st*rd was, he'd obviously done sufficient homework to have noted my previous performances in mile and 880 yard races so I was shang-haied into the Roman team in my third year. I came about 7th or 8th and HATED every minute of it! However, Harry Askew noted that I was the first 3rd year home, patted me on the back and said, "Well done - you'll win it for us next year." It sounded more like a CCF order than an encouragement. And that was it for the next four years. Expectation and Commitment To the House Cause weighs heavy on young shoulders. I swore that I would never run more than just the one Cross Country per year and continued to hate every minute. In the 5th year I was exceedingly grateful to Polgreen (can't remember his first name - was it Doug or John?) for showing me how to win the Senior race. His tactics worked for the next two years. From the comfort of my chair after all these years I STILL can't see the attraction! (DGM)
Of course I remember the ploy - there was a convenient
cattle trough near some trees, up a rise to the right as one entered
Why was it that myself and my two friends seem to be the only ones that were whacked for the much-repeated cross country stunt? (See below from "The Whack"): Four whacks and you joined the elite few who reached this plateau. Scotty McGregor George Delmonte and myself became members of the group after completing about half a mile of the annual cross country, sitting in a ditch until the leaders made the turn and came back again, and tagging along behind them to come in fourth, fifth and sixth. Harry Askew took this as a personal offense, he being an Olympic athlete (third in the 100 years high hurdles at the Wembley games in 1948). The next day in George's study we watched his hair lip positively tremble as he told us how we had insulted Mr. Askew by making a laughing stock of the annual cross country run. We were then sent outside and one by one bought in to get our four and, to add insult to injury, apologize to Harry while trying not to rub the hurt bit. Was it that in latter years this stunt was not considered "whackable" or what? (Mike Merry)
Two paces behind Taffy Thomas would have ensured that you were cosily inside the brick shelter-thingy for the duration of the afternoon as I'm certain that Taffy's idea of supervising a cross country afternoon would be to shout "Go" (with a heavy Welsh accent) and then take refuge until the perspiring mob returned! Maximum effort my a***!! (DGM)
Mike, If you'd had the sense to come in last, second last and third last - or even dead-heating for last place - I'm sure Harry would just have commiserated with you for your lack of athletic ability, twitted you on the state of your lungs and taken the matter no further. However, I do wonder whether any others on the staff considered this to be too severe a punishment, unfitted to the crime, and therefore became rather less vigilant in future? "making a laughing stock of the annual cross country run". (DGM)
That ozzie b*gg*r Gregory is trying to drop me once more into the sh*t, by doing what he does best. (porkies), about the running that is. (Phil Kingham)
I beg to differ, Mr B.
We never did cross-country that I remember, it was always a "Road
Run" up to Ardleigh Green, down the
We too had the annual Cross Country from
I have been reading with interest the comment on the X-country running, but have been disappointed that there has been no comment about the "pipe bombs" that were a regular part of the activity in my time. These were placed under trees roots and detonated without loss of limb!! I believe. I, of course, was not involved in that activity but, in addition to those that took an alternate route, the "bombers" were a regular feature - home made I believe (sugar and fertilizer?). Was this only short lived or did other years continue the practice? (Peter Cowling)
This boy is an example of how one person can ruin things for
all, without thought for others :-) In my day a master would usually park up in
Boy! Do pay attention! There was the cross country run as a regular alternative to footy and the occasional road run which was due to rain stopping play elsewhere. Cross country was skiveable, road run wasn't. Cross country could be made enjoyable, road run couldn't. I'd completely forgotten the misery of the road run until this thread started. When I moved on to Southampton Uni we also had a compulsory cross country run. The only difference was that if you were really keen and finished it quickly you got sent off for a second run! Yes, things actually could get worse, mind you, with an ex Royal Navy Petty Officer (professional sadist) running the show what could you expect? (Christopher C. Broadbridge)
I note the skiving discussion here and following postings. I had heard of the whacks (MJM refers) and I was a good boy but a very poor runner. So was I the ONLY boy to complete the course? After the first two or three runs, I would stop at the top and have my ciggie in perfect peace, alone, at the end of the pack and admiring the view. I would be so late back that all others had bathed and gone and the organiser (Willie G?) would have to wait for me (It was sometimes nearly dark in winter). He just asked me to hurry along. So he didn't care whether I ran the whole course or not. He preferred not. (MJM)
We could of course have tagged on the back of the pack but then the whole object of the exercise would have been lost. There was a large crowd gathered at the finish line, who could resist such an audience? This wasn't just one of the weekly runs, this was the school championship with Gordon Ownen, Lindy Robinson, Ted Theobald etc. all trying to win. We basked in the cheers that day. Of course, 99% of the watchers knew that Scotty McGregor, who smoked 15 cigarettes a day, could not have been in the front group. George Delmonte's exercise was dancing at the Ilford Palais, there was no way he could have been there. As for myself, I did play football and cricket, swim and box but running was definitely not a sport I was known for one of them and everyone knew it! Ah! the cheers and jeers and the look on Harry Askew's face. He just didn't know whether to believe it or not. We tried to brazen it out but Harry was suspicious. Instead of laughing he went red in the face and became very pi**ed of and upset that someone should actually try and make a fool of him. This attitude was even more prominent the next day in Scruff's study. Scruff of course could allow no boy to take the pi** out of a master and he came down heavily on us. McGregor of course was doing his best to be sorry. He didn't mean to make fun of Mr. Askew. He didn't mean to mixed up in the front group. He had hurt his leg etc etc., all of which Scruff listened to without a hint of sympathy. I thought it was quite harmless at the time but Harry, with his semi-neadathal looks (triangular shaped face when seen from the side with the nose as the point of the triangle and the receding chin and forehead) his long black hair falling across one eye and his weasel like features, was looking very hurt standing by Scruff as we were read the riot act. When you think of it, Olympic athlete or not, he must have been a bit twisted to stand and watch that bamboo come down twelve times on three different backsides, padded as they were with gym shorts and CCF pants that we had prepared with, fully knowing what was coming. Still, that was all of 45 or so years ago and Harry is probably just bones now. (Mike Merry)
I recall the use of those substances in bomb-making but not particularly in connection with cross-country running. It does however, remind me of another "incident" (in c. 1959) when a number of us were hauled up before GHRN having been caught putting calcium carbide in puddles around the school and igniting the acetylene bubbling to the surface - fairly spectacular in its way. We got a grilling from the prefects (a bit big for their boots most of 'em) followed by the audience with the Head at which he asked his "adviser", Boozer Graham, what punishment he thought we should suffer. His answer: " put 'em in a room full of Hydrogen Sulphide". He asked me what I knew about H2S and seemed surprised when I was able to answer but, surprisingly, I don't recall that there was any punishment at all, in the end! (Bob Tucker) No, the cross country was far less energetic if only because by our time there was rarely a master present and he never partook of the running activity himself. Also, one got a hot shower at the end which, looking back, was pretty stupid prior to a mile or more walk to the nearest bus stop in the middle of winter. No, we didn't go cross country running to run! As mentioned elsewhere, footy was pretty elitist, if one wasn't in the top twenty two one didn't exist and there were no talent scouts looking for fresh blood. Footy at Balgores with the associated fag-free walk each way was not my idea of fun. (Chris Broadbridge)
I wonder how many people remember the annual purgatory of
the X-country race which started in
I remember doing the race, possibly 5th form. Unfortunately I was one of the few who took it semi-seriously so don't have any funny memories, except the sprint at the start you mentioned. All I remember is trying unsuccessfully to overhaul messrs Ball and Evans (Mervin) at the finish. (Cliff J.)
Yes I remember well the Bedfords Park X-Country for it was here that I committed an act of 24-carat skullduggery, now to be revealed after thirty years! As the race commenced during heavy ground conditions, and during the inevitable sprint for position, I delivered a sly, yet firm tackle from behind, causing the unsuspecting recipient to collapse like a sack of sh...spuds, headfirst into the mud. In no time at all, baying, laughing runners were trampling the now desperate body, some even delivering swift kicks to the arse. Even as he attempted to rise, flashing plimsolls repeatedly booted the almost lifeless schoolboy who could only meekly respond with "stop it"!! The unfortunate victim was one Nigel Sole. Sorry mate! (Spencer Pratten)
Peter Benson asks if DGM remembers going into the "Cauliflower"
PH after a victorious County Basketball match at Ilford baths with the rather
tiny three or four year old ginger person?
Hell yes!! What a night that was! Ilford Baths packed to the rafters with
a screaming and very partisan Essex crowd who MUST have been worth ten or
twenty points to us! The "Essex" team (AKA The RLS Senior basketball
team - not quite the one in the photo - AKA the Mustangs plus two A.N. Others)
all hyped up and playing their socks off (and, incidentally, giving the
spectators the impression that they had a BLOODY good coach!!!) and managing
to dish out a convincing beating to a Surrey team who were quite definitely
the favourites on paper! (Including one Viv Astling, an England player)
I think we THOROUGHLY deserved a mild celebration in the Cauliflower afterwards
and I DO remember an exceedingly well-behaved, well-mannered, rather tiny
three or four year old ginger person with a rather shy smile who was clearly
caught up in the occasion and seemed to thoroughly enjoy himself - perhaps
just a shade in awe of all those noisy big people. (David Maltby)