After over a decade, the article on Robert C. Priddy (as scanned below from the English Wikipedia page) was deleted by users (without an admin. decision) on Wikipedia, relying on obscure technicalities and biased points of view. They had whittled down the content bit by bit and then deleted the remainder, using specious grounds and untrue representation of references to my work. This occurred after many Sai Baba devotees and other believers in gurus had unsucessfully tried to deface and delete the article for many years. After a nomination for deletion 17 November 2006, the administrators had voted overwhelmingly that the page be kept. Eventually the sheer volume of deleters managed to delete the page without any administrators taking action against them. The fanatics also used a false IP to hack into my talk page and so get the administration to bane me from editing it. However, the German version of Wikipedia retained exactly the same material for Robert C. Priddy as one can see here
The main reason for all the attacks on this article were that I, Priddy, am a whistle blower as to the crimes of Sathya Sai Baba, which offended the cult followers (and other fanatical defenders of God since his comprehensive documentation is continuously being proven true. Among the persons responsible for deletion were User Meco (aka Halvor Raknes Johansen), who works constantly and most obsessively on Wikipedia as an editor (and who has signally failed to qualify as an administrator, despite his hundreds of thousands of entries) and who states that his employer is God and is a God worker and a shaman! (See his user page scanned below). He has been blocked from the Norwegian Wikipedia page by a consensus decision of the administrators, yet he still ranges freely on the English pages. He had (necessarily) informed me he intended to delete the article, saying that he had once known a child of mine (it was a at kindergarten around 1967 for some months, at which time I had begun to lecture in philosophy for foreign students at the University of Oslo). He further seems to have developed some grudge against me (obviously baseless as he was less than 3 years old at the time I knew of his existence as a playmate of my offspring, but no more than that). He warned me in his e-mail out of the blue that he would use any reply I might make to him on Wikipedia or elsewhere. It was reported to me that he is psychically-challenged, as his own self-description only serves to emphasize (see lower down this page). Later, he was banned permanently from Wikipedia, as one can see from the following scan:-
However, this does not help me since he managed to get Wikipedia to block my talk page so I could not rebut his claims (which were false) and because no one can edit their own Wikipedia page, and no associate or relative of the person can edit the page either. It has to be a disinterested independent person. The Wikipedia administration does not right such wrongs without a costly lawsuit, so it remains blocked, and - adding insult to injury - Wikipedia advertises the fact when one tries to enter the Robert C. Priddy page!.
He has worked on my pages in tandem with down-putting User: Geschichte - apparently his conspirator.